That is, the factor that should compensate for the derivation is reduced as much as possible.Īnd here a logical question arises: did S.I. So, the neck of the bayonet is just shortened in order to keep this pair of forces to a minimum. “Because of the abutment of the bayonet to the right-hand barrel, the center of gravity of the rifle also shifts to the right during the shot, a pair of forces is formed, which rotates the rifle in the direction opposite to the abutment of the bayonet. Recall what we talked about in the previous chapter. And the fact that to reduce this influence at the bayonet shortened neck, too. Let's see what about the bayonet is written in this book.Īs you can see, the impact of the bayonet on the deflection of the bullet when fired is written. There is not a word about such a mission of the bayonet and in all those “Instructions for Shooting Training” and “Instructions on Shooting Case”. But, despite the fact that the process of creating the “3x linear rifle of the 1891 model of the year” is painted many times and in detail in many books, there is not a word about such a design finding as compensation for the derivation with a bayonet.
Cutting the trunk "trilinek" right-hand, therefore, the bullet will deviate to the right, which means that the bayonet is fastened to the right. Knowing that the middle point of the hits is shifted in the direction opposite to the side of the bayonet, we set the bayonet so that this offset compensates for the derivation. And such a decision, at first glance, lies on the surface. Thus, at the time of creating the “3x linear rifle of the 1891 model of the year”, all the necessary theoretical information was at the disposal of its creator in order to try to reduce the negative effect of derivation with the help of certain design solutions. Thus, it can be said that when creating small arms in its design or in the construction of its sighting devices, the phenomenon of derivation is taken into account, it can be applied to samples designed after 1870 of the year. It is necessary to take into account that the Maiev artilleryman, therefore, in relation to small arms, the theory had to be further developed. Maievsky publishes The Capital of External Ballistics Capital Work. It was in the 1870 year, on the 50th anniversary of the Mikhailovsky Artillery Academy N.V. The derivation phenomenon was studied in 1865 - 1870 and was first explained by the Russian scientist N.V. Among them are air resistance and gravity.ĭerivation (view of the trajectory from the side).Ĥ, 5 - derivation on the trajectory and at the point of incidence.Īs can be seen from the figure, as the bullet moves away from the muzzle of the weapon, the value of the derivational deviation rapidly and progressively increases. To begin with, the departure of a bullet from the barrel is accompanied by the impact of various disturbances on it. Here it is worth a little patience and remember the school course of physics. To begin with, we define what a derivation is. In short, the purpose of this chapter is to refute the claim of an unknown author that the bayonet on the “3x linear rifle of the 1891 model of the year” is set to the right to compensate for the derivation phenomenon. However, there is nothing in the descriptions of various kickbacks, compensators and relaxers that can somehow influence the derivation with their help. There is no this method of influence on the derivation and in the literature on internal ballistics, namely, in its section that studies the interaction of powder gases with various muzzle nozzles used to improve the performance characteristics of small weapons.
Why am I stressed about the internet? Because there is no such way to deal with this phenomenon in any textbook on external ballistics, to the scope of which the derivation applies.
#1941 german mauser rifle with bayonet full
Versions on the derivation compensation with the help of the bayonet are full of internet.